[PSUBS-MAILIST] New submarine

Tue Apr 8 22:14:54 EDT 2014

$125,000 is reachable for me. Sounds like this could be a reality.
Thanks,
Scott Waters

Sent from my U.S. Cellular© SmartphoneVance Bradley <VBra676539 at AOL.com> wrote:He said in an interview that Idabel cost $125,000.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 8, 2014, at 10:03 PM, Douglas Suhr <spiritofcalypso at gmail.com> wrote:

Scott, I have no experience with any large pressure chambers, but I am sure you are talking well into the thousands (perhaps $15,000 to $35,000) depending on how long it takes to set up the required tests (and perform them). 

I truly admire your ambition, but like Hank suggested, 1000 feet may be a better 2nd sub goal. If I were planning to go beyond 1000 feet, I would be looking to Nuytco, SeaMagine or Triton but of course cost is then a major issue again. Does anyone know about how much Karl spent building Idabel? ~ Douglas S. 

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:48 PM, swaters <swaters at waters-ks.com> wrote:
Any idea as to the cost of pressure testing that kind of pressure? 
Also, I am not a engineer, but am fairly good at designing things in my head. If I designed this in CAD, does psubs have a good way of sharing CAD files for who ever would like too look at my designs and bounce ideas off of? 
I would love for this project to be a way for psubs to increase overall psubs knowledge of cutting edge and affordable solutions for things like sonar and manipulator arms and things.
Thanks,
Scott Waters

Sent from my U.S. Cellular© Smartphone

Vance Bradley <VBra676539 at AOL.com> wrote:
Maryland and California (Navy) and Texas (southwest research).
Vance

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 8, 2014, at 7:14 PM, swaters <swaters at waters-ks.com> wrote:

So is the design of crush depth of 1750m and test to 1250m the idea? Next question is where can you find a pressure chamber that has 1670psi capability?
Thanks,
Scott Waters

Sent from my U.S. Cellular© Smartphone

Alan James <alanlindsayjames at yahoo.com> wrote:
Scott,
in general people design their boats with a crush depth of
twice their operating depth, then test them to 1.25 or 1.5 x
there proposed maximum operating depth.
So design to 2000 meters & test it to 1250 meters.
Alan

From: swaters <swaters at waters-ks.com>
To: personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 4:29 PM
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] New submarine

I am playing with the idea of building another submarine. Here is what I am thinking.
1) This project needs to be as challenging as the same amount of difficulty as it was to build my first submarine
2) I want to have lots of bottom time with my K-350 to learn what needs to be improved on in design and ability.
3) Learn to use CAD
4) Project will take 5-7 years to complete

My initial goals are
1) Hold 3 people
2) Weigh 10,500lbs or less
3) Depth of 3,300 feet (1000m)
4) Have a very effective range of abilities such as a good manipulator arm and tooling
5) Have a wide veiwing maybe a acylic dome front

Ok, shoot holes in the ideas. What will be the main challenges to overcome? What complications am I not considering?

Thanks,
Scott Waters

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20140408/769acc25/attachment-0001.html>