<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div>As an alternative to possible death or even worse, the loss of your submarine,</div><div>I am in early stages of designing a buoy release mechanism that is used</div><div>for surfacing safely but has an emergency beacon that can be activated </div><div>with an electro magnet.</div><div>Thoughts are to use 150 lb braid with a tensioning mechanism & have an</div><div>automatic boat latch mechanism that can slide down the braid but is fixed</div><div>to the buoy with instructions, "tie a long rope to the ring & let down untill</div><div>latch attaches to submarine. Pull up"</div><div>The automatic latch is a device that Phil described & provided a drawing for,</div><div>but there may be a cheap & suitable automatic boat latch ( used on release</div><div>& retrieve on boat launching) on the market. I am still searching & if anyone</div><div>knows of one that may be suitable I would be interested.</div><div>Alan</div><div><br>On 24/04/2019, at 10:51 AM, Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles <<a href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>There is a significant difference between submarine escape and a planned SCUBA dive with regard to both the dive profile and the equipment that you can reasonably carry. An escape is more akin to what is known as a buoyant emergency ascent in recreational diving, where you need to get to the surface yesterday and all other considerations are secondary. In this specific case, trying to keep to a slow ascent rate would significantly increase the incurred decompression obligation that you must necessarily then blow off as you ascend through the shallows, introducing an even greater risk. You also have the hypothermia issue to deal with if you are not equipped with exposure protection specifically intended for submersion at depth. Being cold reduces decompression effectiveness. In order to keep to a target ascent rate or perform decompression stops, you would need diving instrumentation (depth gauge and timer), would need the skills and experience to perform gas switches and hold stops, and would need significantly more bulky equipment to have enough gas to perform a proper decompression (slow ascent, gas switches, etc.).<br></div><div><br></div><div>When I dive to these depths on SCUBA, I wear twin cylinders (>100 cu. ft. each) on my back with the bottom gas (10/70 or whatever for the planned depth and time), plus three or four off-board cylinders (80s) carrying the decompression gases (typically 21/35, 35/25, EAN50 and oxygen), plus a small bottle of argon for drysuit inflation. Obviously, as an escapee you are not so equipped. Far better to lockout as quickly as possible and rapidly ascend (with buoyant assist) to get clear of those depths where you are ongassing the most, and if at all possible, to slow the ascent as you approach the surface, and then have your surface support or emergency responders administer oxygen as transport is arranged to recompression. To be clear, an emergency escape from a disabled submarine at these depths is not even remotely a good idea - it is simply a marginally better idea than dying on the bottom.<br></div><div class="protonmail_signature_block protonmail_signature_block-empty"><div class="protonmail_signature_block-user protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br></div><div class="protonmail_signature_block-proton protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br></div></div><div><br></div><div>To illustrate, if you were to attempt a continuous ascent from 300 fsw, the average depth is 150 fsw, which is about 5.5 atmospheres absolute. If you assume a surface air consumption rate of 1 cu. ft. / minute (high, but typical of a diver who is stressed or working hard, which is inevitable in a submarine escape scenario), that corresponds to 5.5 cu. ft. / min at the average depth of the ascent. At a 30 ft/min ascent rate, that's 10 minutes, or 55 cu. ft. of gas consumed just for the continuous ascent with no decompression stops, without consideration for the gas consumed while blowing down and locking out. You can judge for yourself the practicality of carrying an 80 on a PSub sized vessel just for emergency escape purposes.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Sean<br></div><div><br></div><div>‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐<br></div><div> On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 12:32 PM, David Colombo via Personal_Submersibles <<a href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Guys, This topic is fascinating and scary at the same time. Accent rates form the old Navy logs had 60ft / minute max with a recommended max accent rate of 30 ft/ min. At 300ft escape depth, what volume of mixed gases would you need for a 10 minute accent assuming you choose not to swim 60ft/min.<br></div><div><br></div><div><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Best Regards,<br></div><div>David Colombo<br></div><div><img src="http://static.squarespace.com/static/533310a9e4b0fba62008a464/t/5339c1f2e4b041bac4e25d1b/1396294132055/?format=500w" class="proton-embedded" width="200" height="110"><br></div><div>804 College Ave<br></div><div>Santa Rosa, CA. 95404<br></div><div>(707) 536-1424<br></div><div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.SeaQuestor.com">www.SeaQuestor.com</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Personal_Submersibles mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>