<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div><span></span></div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3044">Alec,</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3103" dir="ltr">the XDC2460 does not advertise itself as suitable for traction vehicles.</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3094" dir="ltr">I know we aren't technically a traction vehicle, but it may indicate that the controller</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3095" dir="ltr">might not be suitable for rugged applications. I do like the radio control input</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3096" dir="ltr">option on it but with a bit of thought you could implement this on a Kelly controller.</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3141" dir="ltr">I have destroyed a few controllers in my playing round :( . The controller is more</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3140" dir="ltr">likely to fail than the motor & if you had a dual motor controller then possibly you would </div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3162" dir="ltr">have 2 motors down instead of one if it failed. </div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3113" dir="ltr">Cheers Alan</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3097" dir="ltr"><br><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3119" style="display: block;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3118" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3117" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3116" dir="ltr"> <font id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3115" face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3114"> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles@psubs.org><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles@psubs.org> <br> <b id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3169"><span id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3168" style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:12 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Speed controllers<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3170"><br><div id="yiv8431262581"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3173"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3172" dir="ltr"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3171">No, the one I was considering was not for brushless motors. It's the Roboteq XDC2460, rated for 80A continuous duty per channel. But now I'm looking at Kelly I really like what I'm seeing there too, and Curtis seems to be similar. This will probably come down to a decision between a more advanced dual channel from Roboteq or a super simple single-channel controllers from the likes of Curtis/Kelly. In general if the simpler one can do the job, it's the one I would prefer even if it cost the same. </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1461107636695_3174"><br clear="none"></div><div>Thanks guys for all the input!</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>Alec</div></div><div class="yiv8431262581gmail_extra"><br clear="none"><div class="yiv8431262581gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>></span> wrote:<br clear="none"><blockquote class="yiv8431262581gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;"><div class="yiv8431262581yqt2263633401" id="yiv8431262581yqt06721"><div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div><span>Hi Alec,</span></div><div dir="ltr"><span>that one says brushless?</span></div><div dir="ltr"><span>On the Kelly faq page for selecting controllers it suggests.....</span></div><span></span><h2 style="font: 17px/25px Oswald, sans-serif; margin: 1px 1px 3px; padding: 0px 0px 10px; color: rgb(64, 64, 64); text-transform: uppercase; text-indent: 0px; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; background-image: none;">HOW TO CHOOSE A SUITABLE CONTROLLER FOR THE MOTOR?</h2><div><div style="margin: 0px 0px 10px; padding: 0px;">Usually the performance will be optimized if the power of the controller is 2.0-3.0 times of the motor's.</div></div><div dir="ltr"> I guess that means if you have a 2000W motor you get a controller whose continual</div><div dir="ltr">amp rating X max voltage is at least 4000W.</div><div dir="ltr"> I have heard that it is better to aire on the safe side as some manufacturers over rate</div><div dir="ltr">their controllers. Kelly have a reputation of being good & cheap, & their ratings accurate,</div><div dir="ltr">however Hugh has had problems with them & I wired up mine yesterday & the ON light</div><div dir="ltr">isn't working when powered up. I put power on it once without the pre-ignition resister</div><div dir="ltr">so this may have stuffed it, but surely it wouldn't be so fickle!</div><div dir="ltr">Alan</div><div dir="ltr"><br clear="none"></div><div><span></span><br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div><div style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> </font><hr size="1"><span> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles <<a href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><br clear="none"> </span><span><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Personal Submersibles General Discussion <<a href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>> <br clear="none"> </span><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, April 20, 2016 9:45 AM<br clear="none"> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [PSUBS-MAILIST] Speed controllers<br clear="none"> </div> <div><div><div class="yiv8431262581h5"><br clear="none"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi all,</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>I need to finalize my selection of speed controllers for Shackleton over the next week or so, and at first blush am looking at this one from Roboteq:</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div><a href="http://www.roboteq.com/index.php/docman/motor-controllers-documents-and-files/documentation/datasheets/hbl23xx/59-hbl23xx-datasheet/file" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect">http://www.roboteq.com/index.php/docman/motor-controllers-documents-and-files/documentation/datasheets/hbl23xx/59-hbl23xx-datasheet/file</a></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>There will be two of them, each driving a pair of MK101 thrusters. Roboteq offers a controller family that is a step down from this and still handles the required amperage, and which is tempting because it's much less expensive. However, the specs are too close for comfort (50A continuous duty rating vs. MK101 requirement of 46A).</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>Anyone have any suggestions for other cost-effective controllers to consider?</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br clear="none">Alec</div></div></div><br clear="none"></div></div><span>_______________________________________________<br clear="none">Personal_Submersibles mailing list<br clear="none"><a href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><br clear="none"><a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></span></div> </div> </div> </div></div></div></div><br clear="none">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<br clear="none">
<a href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><br clear="none">
<a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" shape="rect">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><br clear="none">
<br clear="none"></blockquote></div><br clear="none"></div></div></div><br><div class="yqt2263633401" id="yqt93806">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">Personal_Submersibles mailing list<br clear="none"><a href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><br clear="none"><a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles" target="_blank" shape="rect">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><br clear="none"></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>