[PSUBS-MAILIST] GRP hatch
hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Wed Apr 29 20:05:44 EDT 2020
Rick, I did not try it in water, but did run it on land. I don't ever make drawings of arms, I just find material and go for it. Alec is almost finished building a copy of my arm and will be posting plans for it soon I imagine. Hank
On Wednesday, April 29, 2020, 5:58:49 PM MDT, Rick Patton via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Hank Did you get a chance to try the arm in the water? either way, how did it work and do you have any schematics for it? Rick
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 1:04 PM hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Rick, yes it has a hydraulic arm and I built it. Hank
On Wednesday, April 29, 2020, 4:12:56 PM MDT, Rick Patton via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Hank,I see a mechanical arm on it. Is it Hydraulic or electric and did you build the arm or buy it?Rick
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:50 AM James Frankland via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Ah yes, i think i remember that one. Looks good.
Now i understand what you are all talking about.
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 10:33, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Hi James, this is a little Deep Worker style sub I built in 2012\13 I think. I was working on it when I suddenly had the opportunity to buy Gamma. I just pushed it aside to work on Gamma and eventually stripped it for parts. It has been sitting outside under cover all these years. E-3000 is getting a new paint job right now after some fibreglass repairs. I can't take it out for test dives and pressure test, so I need a project for the summer. I always liked how compact this little sub is. It will be a fun little sub that is real easy to handle at well under 2,000 lbs. As you well know, that is a real treat.Hank On Wednesday, April 29, 2020, 2:04:57 AM MDT, James Frankland via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Hank, which sub is this? Are you doing another along with elementary?
On Tuesday, 28 April 2020, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Alan, true. I am going to put the hull together and throw it in a pond with enough weight inside and outside to sink it. I can hang it off my excavator to add weight in stages. This way I can experiment with it to find the sweet spot. That is the nice thing about this sub-it is so light and tiny.HankGot the new leg tube on today
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, 12:44:56 PM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Hank,if it were me I would test it out with a support person & push the conning tower from side to side at various stages of descent & ascent. If you know it can't turn completely upside down & you are comfortable, orget used to it you might want to live with it. After all it's only a few seconds ofinstability over the period of the dive. Alan
On 29/04/2020, at 6:27 AM, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Alan, that is exactly the idea I have. The MBT's can be in an L shape with a smaller portion extending part way up the CT. Or like you said an independent MBT behind the CT, you can't see behind anyways. The CT is buoyant under water by about 80 lbs so its just a matter of getting under. Hank
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, 12:11:15 PM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Hank,what about a ballast tank behind your head outside the conning tower.>From memory you would probably have the same problem but just notas bad if you lightened the hatch.It looked to have a lot of floatation in the conning tower area, so you maytopple over but not turn upside down. Dive & ascent really quickly?Alan
On 29/04/2020, at 3:28 AM, Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Hank,
I'm only aware of a couple of subs with composite hulls, and the thing is I understand them to be not hand laid but constructed by the computer-controlled spinning of a single strand on a big megabucks machine. And even then, I'heard they discovered voids when cutting the hull open.
The trick might be just to concentrate on emptying those MBT really fast by using bigger valves or more of them. That, or an MBT design that reduces the free surface area during diving, or which divides the surface areas into smaller ones via internal MBT bulkheads. I'm guessing you have something like that in mind?
Thanks,
Alec
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:13 AM hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Alec, yes it is a bit out there. I was thinking I would clamp one to the K350 hatch and sink it to test depth for testing. I figures if there are GRP hulls then why not a hatch. I do have a design for MBT's that could solve the problem. The sub is fine when submerged. Maybe that is the safest solutionHank
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, 8:05:13 AM MDT, Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Hi Hank,
Personally I'd have to research stress calculations in GRP before going that route. But even once that were figured out, the build variations in hand-laid GRP would make me sceptical of my own calculations. I suppose the alternative would be to make a number of them and test to destruction. It would have to be a number of them, not just a single sample, because evaluating standard deviation would be just as important as confirming the depth rating. That's rather painful, so for my part I'd look at other solutions.
Thanks,Alec
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:50 AM hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Alec, I think Mike has a submarine parts warehouse lol. I would like to use what I have, just so I don't have to make too many major modifications. Have you ever heard od a GRP hatch?Hank
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, 7:44:51 AM MDT, Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Hi Hank,
May I suggest speaking to Mike Caudle? He has two acrylic cylinder CTs, complete with hatches and all, that are beauties but I believe much lower displacement than the one on your project sub, and very lightweight because they are aluminum. If you can arrange a swap or something, one of those might be just what you need.
Best,Alec
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:17 AM hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs. org> wrote:
Hi All, I am have some real trouble with my DW style sub mods. If you recall it has an acrylic cylinder CT and a K350 hatch. My problem is, the sub lacks volume to support the heavy hatch\land assembly. I do plan to increase the volume by installing a larger diameter leg tube. This volume increase is still not enough to give me enough buoyancy for stability during transition from surface to being submerged. Options are to loose the cylinder and go with dome. Make a lightweight hatch with GRP, or come up with a creative MBT that maintains buoyancy longer during submerging. Hank______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20200430/0cef1171/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Personal_Submersibles
mailing list