[PSUBS-MAILIST] Pneumatic Manipulator

hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Sun Mar 18 17:31:33 EDT 2018


 Alan,I don't have a scuba tank on Gamma and I don't feel like buying a scuba regulator right now.  I have a 6,000 psi regulator laying around, so I plumbed it into my system and that feeds the low pressure regulator out in the water.  I can just feed 200 psi to the low pressure regulator and forget it.Hank
    On Sunday, March 18, 2018, 1:58:37 PM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
 Hank,not understanding properly.The relieving regulator that Cliff has, has an inlet pressure of 300 psi &maintains your set pressure above ambient. If you ran a hose from the lowpressure port of a first stage regulator then you would have round about130psi above ambient; I would think that you could then go down a few thousand feet with that set up. Even though the inlet pressure would be well beyondthe regulators rating, the internal pressure would balance it out.Alan

Sent from my iPad
On 19/03/2018, at 3:46 AM, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:


 Alan,Yes that is pretty much what I did, the only difference between my compensation system and Cliff's is, I am using an internal regulator to feed air to the external regulator.  This is possible because the dives planned for this spring and summer fall within the limits of the external regulators maximum upstream pressure.  I just don't feel like buying another part at the moment.Hank
    On Saturday, March 17, 2018, 9:49:38 PM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
 Hank,the more I look in to it the more I think you are on to something justair compensating these Lenco actuators. I have seen some on Ebaythat are quite cheap. There would be very little air void to compensate& if you drill in to the piston area as you said, & are using Hugh / Cliff's pressure regulator to add a bit of overpressure & vent, then that should be a great little product. If you were going a few thousand feet thenmaybe go to oil compensation.I have a PS2 input / output converter ( now discontinued) that would begreat for speed control & forward & back on 4 actuators from a playstation 2 controller. There are other robot associated products thatcan do this, just a matter of finding something simple to hook up.Alan

Sent from my iPad
On 18/03/2018, at 9:13 AM, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:


 Alan,  that will work, and could be cheaper.  One nice thing with the Lenco actuator, no limit switching.  The motor freewheels when it reaches the end of the stroke.  What do you have against air compensating Lenco's ?  simple, cheap, robust, available, etc....Hank
    On Saturday, March 17, 2018, 1:42:32 PM MDT, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
  Alan, the motor housing is not sealed from the shaft housing.Hank
    On Saturday, March 17, 2018, 11:55:19 AM MDT, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
  Alan, the picture is deceiving, at the base of the gear set there is a bushing to support the rotating shaft and I had to drill a air passage in that area.  The ss rod is hollow and the oil can not get in and out of that void easily.Hank
    On Saturday, March 17, 2018, 8:53:53 AM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
 Hank,thanks for the advice on the pneumatics.Several years ago I was looking for replacement gears for the lenco tospeed up the travel on one of the longer stroked models. Looking at the diagram below, oil could move down the spiral of the threaded rod, into the ram. As the ram moved in and out oil could followit down this path. However on the diagram there looks to be a circular discwith an O ring seal at the head of the threaded rod, this would need tobe drilled through. If you could attach a hose fitting where the wires comeout you could run oil & wires out through a hose. Put a T on the hose forthe wires to come out & continue the other branch to a compensator.   I had liked your idea of a pneumatic cylinder with motor & planetarygear box in it, but as you found, it could be a lot of mucking about whenthere is an off the shelf item.I have drawings for an oil compensator & there is not much to them.Replacing the motor with brushless could be a hasle & it seems quite anexpence buying a Lenco actuator & butchering it.I will have another Google & think about things.Alan


<image1.JPG>
Sent from my iPad
On 18/03/2018, at 1:05 AM, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:


 Alan,I did some experimenting with air cylinders and started testing joints with mechanical resistance to reduce or stop the bounce.  I made up disks that went between the arm joints that could be tensioned to act like brake disks.  Kinda like a motorcycle clutch.  This does work to an extent but counterproductive from an energy conservation point of view.With your knowledge of brushless motors and controlling them, it would seem your direction should be to modify a Lenco actuator by removing the motor and replacing it with a brushless motor to oil fill it.   There is one small challenge thought, and that is to relieve the oil trapped behind the threaded rod.  The threaded rod spins inside a fixed nut with very tight tolerance.  the tight tolerance may not let the oil flow when a void is created by the rod extending.  I started to drill holes in the ss rod to create an oil passage way but stopped for fear of creating a bigger problem thus holding up the project.  If you want to collaborate on making an oil filled actuator by converting a Lenco actuator, I would be in.If your concern with these actuators is the short stroke, don't be.  The arm can be designed with stroke multipliers, that is already in my plan for the next generation arm.Hank

    On Saturday, March 17, 2018, 3:54:24 AM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
 Thanks Steve,I thought there might be a solenoid valve that gave a good variable control overthe flow.I did experiment quite a bit with linear actuators, but thought pneumatics mightbe a lot simpler. The commercial deep sea linear actuators are oil filled & use brushless motors. As I found out, the small brushed motors don't run so well inoil. They have external oil reservoirs to compensate for the piston movement &an overpressure. Can always re-look at them.Cheers Alan


Sent from my iPad
On 17/03/2018, at 3:58 PM, Stephen Fordyce via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:


Hi Alan,I've done a little with pneumatic cylinders and I think it will be very difficult to achieve any kind of accurate positioning. Pneumatic is fine if you only need a cylinder to be fully extended or retracted (as is used for industrial automation) but anything mid way is likely to need a complicated feedback/control system.
Even considering as a perfect system, if you have varying force/load, to avoid movement you must have an equally varying pressure in the cylinder. Increasing pressure in the cylinder doesn't help because you then need to increase pressure in the opposite side and then the tendency to resist a disturbing force is not much different anyway. (And if using a single rod cylinder, the pressures in each end need to be different to achieve the same force due to area of the piston) Throw in real world considerations of static friction and dynamic friction and it's harder again to reach and hold a desired position.
I'm a bit surprised you haven't already ordered a cheap pneumatic cylinder for some concept testing :).  That should give you a feel pretty quickly if it's doable or not.
Cheers,Steve Fordyce
On 17 Mar 2018 7:27 am, "Alan via Personal_Submersibles" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:

Have thought a lot about pneumatic manipulators.
Hank has commented several times that they are too "spongy".
If you had pressure relief valves or similar in the system set at something
like 30 psi, so there was always a minimum of 30 psi either side of the piston;
would this make it a lot less "spongey".
You would now need to put an extra 30psi in to get the same force.
It would mean more air, but it is not likely you would be using the manipulator
every dive, & it would be a small quantity compared with blowing a ballast tank.
Has this been done before?
Cheers Alan



Sent from my iPad

______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles



_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
  

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
  _______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
  _______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
  

<image1.JPG>

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
  

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20180318/c3a99c53/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Personal_Submersibles mailing list