[PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL

[Alan via Personal_Submersibles]

Scott,
DNVGL considered my 500ft design as deep diving.
Below is there response on this.
Alan

No. 500ft is seen as a deep depth, where even tec-divers will have difficulties to reach without special preparations. 
96h additional life support is intended to enable rescue teams to arrive, find and reach the submersible as well to apply means for rescue of the submersible (if e.g. stucked or entangled, the pilot became unconscious, etc.)

Sent from my iPad

> On 21/10/2017, at 1:26 PM, Scott Waters via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> 
> I have heard 2 things
> *2000m or more
> *Have the ballast use a high pressure pump.
> 
> But there isn't a law or anything so I guess anyone could call anything they like. Haha
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> Date: 10/20/17 5:57 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Scott Waters via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL
> 
> What is the depth rating a sub needs to be to be considered a DSV?
> Hank
> 
> On Friday, October 20, 2017, 3:57:54 PM MDT, Scott Waters via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks Carsten,
> 
> We actually already have the rules and have been deep deep down the rabbit hole. Haha. There is some wording that does not jive with some of other parts as well as some things we are going to need acceptions on since we are a DSV and not a traditional submarine.
> 
> Thank you,
> Scott Waters
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "MerlinSub at t-online.de via Personal_Submersibles" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> Date: 10/20/17 12:51 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL
> 
> Scott the rules are online : 
> 
> https://rules.dnvgl.com/ServiceDocuments/dnvgl/#!/industry/1/Maritime/5/DNV%20GL%20rules%20for%20classification:%20Underwater%20technology%20(RU-UWT)
> 
> No need to ask an inspector. 
> 
> vbr Carsten 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original-Nachricht-----
> Betreff: [PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL
> Datum: 2017-10-20T19:26:21+0200
> Von: "via Personal_Submersibles" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> An: "PSUBS" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> 
> Is there anyone on PSUBS that is familiar with DNVGL rules? We have some basic questions, but are trying not to consult an inspector for every question because of the cost. 
> 
> Thank you,
> Scott 
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20171021/910c3348/attachment.html>