[PSUBS-MAILIST] engine drive

Mon Aug 21 18:58:50 EDT 2017

Hank,

I’m a guy with a big nose so that is what it’s for.  We make compressors and learned that too many instruments is a source for problems.  As it is, I have too many instruments.  Simplicity is best.

However we have a CO monitor which also detects hydrogen so I think it might also do hydrocarbons. The biggest concern is exhaust fumes being drawn in through the snorkel from a following breeze when charging the batteries.  Hugh

From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org] On Behalf Of hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
Sent: Monday, 21 August 2017 11:17 PM
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] engine drive

Hugh, 

That is a nice set up, and the fuel injection is ideal.  Are you using a vapour sensor?  

Hank

On Sunday, August 20, 2017, 7:19:02 PM MDT, Hugh Fulton via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:

Hi Hank,

The engines are inside 24” diameter vessels rated for full depth Plus.  Air intake is from the cabin so surface running the engines are drawing air in from snorkels into the cabin and then through non returns to the engine housing.  That way surface running can have the hatch closed and fresh air is provided en route to the engines that way it keeps the cabin cool.  Motors are using fuel injection. Not carburettors.   Hugh

From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org] On Behalf Of hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
Sent: Monday, 21 August 2017 11:56 AM
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] engine drive

Hugh,

I had two options in mind, well actually three.  One was a bladder, the other a full pressure rated tank or a detachable tank that stores in the inflatable tender that I am now towing.   The bladder would be very easy and I have an enclosed space for it already.  I also would only need about 20 litres.

Detaching would probably be the most simple.  Inside the sub is not an option at all.

You have a couple of high power gas engines in Q-sub ?  They must be in a pressure compensated enclosure.  I tried to find that information today to steal an idea or two ;-)   You must also be dealing with potential vapours.

Hank

On Sunday, August 20, 2017, 5:45:35 PM MDT, Hugh Fulton via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:

Hi Hank,

I am a believer of putting the fuel outside the vessel in the form of a bladder.  

100 litres of diesel/petrol would weight about 83 and 75 kg resprctively so would be positive 17 or 25 kg flotation but if inside the vessel would be 83 kg negative and when empty would be 83 kg of unwanted flotation if diesel.  The additional safety of having a bladder outside is the biggest consideration. Hugh

From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org] On Behalf Of irox via Personal_Submersibles
Sent: Monday, 21 August 2017 11:02 AM
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] engine drive

Hi Hank,

one of the key dangers with gasoline vapor is that it's heavier than air, so it will pool inside the sub (this has not changed with advancements in ICE technology).   Even with good ventilation, purging the pressure hull of gasoline vapor may be tricky.

You could look at converting the engine to something which is lighter than air (hydrogen?), but this should under go a lot of research/experimentation to ensure it's safe.

There has been a lot of discussion of using gas engines in sub in the past (bionic dolphin uses gas, but this is more enclosed jet skii than submarine), none of which seemed yield a safe approach to this.

Could you cut open your hull to install the engine, then weld it up again?

Good luck,

  Ian.

-----Original Message----- 
From: hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles 
Sent: Aug 20, 2017 3:41 PM 
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion 
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] engine drive 

Alec,

Yes it may be to scary, I will give it more thought.  I need more range, and my boat will not be ready for the spring of 2018.  It is bad enough I missed this season ;-(  I need a working submarine with reliable range and batteries will not do it.    

The danger is gas vapour reaching an explosive level.  That would mean a leak and no proper venting coupled with an ignition source.  Both these risks can be managed.  Diesel fuel in a hot enclosed environment is not as volatile but still not without risk.  In all fairness, you can't compare early antique engines with a modern-day Honda.  My options are limited with an 18 inch opening.  

Hank

On Sunday, August 20, 2017, 4:21:51 PM MDT, Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:

Sorry to be critical, but yes, from an historical perspective a gas engine would be a big no-no as gas powered subs were death traps prior to the adoption of diesel. I always say my subs are at their most dangerous in the shop, not in the water. This could be a situation where the drained gas engine is not dangerous underwater but is dangerous during surface transit. And frankly storing the gas outboard sounds like a bit of a challenge in itself.  I applaud original solutions, but this isn't one that sounds like a good idea, at least to me.

Gamma seems to have pretty good range on batteries, and I recall you're planning on the trailerable landing craft. Would the landing craft not obviate the need for an onboard ICE?

Cheers,

Alec

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:50 AM, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:

Hi All,

My diesel engine did not work out in the end, and 6 hp I suspect is a bit skinny.   I do have a beautiful 15 hp 4 stroke Honda outboard that has been converted to run a hydraulic pump inboard.  I converted it many years ago to power my sternwheeler but ended up with an antique engine. The engine is stripped down to a bare engine with external water pump and internal oil cooler.  The problem is, it is a gas engine, and that is a big NO NO or is it?   If the fuel supply is outside the hull and the engine is run out of fuel before a dive, then there is no fuel at all inside the sub while it dives.  An engine compartment blower fan can constantly circulate air through a duct to the outside of the sub.  I know as a rule it is considered a bad idea but with careful   installation it could be a very nice drive system.  This would be much quieter and smoother than a diesel engine.  The Honda would be very easy to remove from the escape pod if I need to escape.  The Honda 4 stroke is as reliable as even a Yanmar diesel.   I was bragging to a Honda mechanic one time that the Honda starts with two pulls in the spring.  He said it must need a tune up LOL  it should start in one pull.  

Hank

______________________________ _________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs. org <mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org> 
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/personal_ submersibles <http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles> 

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20170822/f9bbb437/attachment-0001.html>