[PSUBS-MAILIST] Hatch interlock

Thu Mar 3 08:55:10 EST 2016

Seal condition monitoring is a secondary benefit. The primary purpose of the system is to generate an interlock signal (stable vacuum between seals + dogs engaged = hatch closed) which is used elsewhere in the software logic, so it has to have an electronic output.

Ergonomics come into play too, which is why I am trying to minimize the number of analog gauges - only those required by the rules which serve critical backup functions. Displays which are too busy can be confusing. There is going to be a ton of equipment crammed into a small space, and I don't want to run more piping or cabling than necessary so that I can keep things clean, or at least, as clean as has ever been seen in a submersible.  Critical information readily visible, everything else at your fingertips on demand, and an easily accessible, exhaustively labeled yet simple and intuitive manual backup system for when the SHTF.

Central control and monitoring also enables me to echo important information to a display within the lockout chamber for the benefit of its occupants.

Sean

On March 3, 2016 6:32:22 AM MST, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>Hi Sean,Since the goal here is to monitor o-ring condition.  How about
>a central pump with a manifold with a vent valve and gauge piped to
>your dash.  In the name of keeping it simple, there is no need for
>anything electronic. Steve has the gauge that can handle the pressure
>boundaries. Your set up does not need to indicate witch o-ring is in
>trouble because your going to abort regardless of witch one it is.  A
>visual inspection at the surface will locate the problem.  Hank 
>
>On Thursday, March 3, 2016 5:32 AM, Sean T. Stevenson via
>Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> 
>
>Actually, I'll be using a PAC - a slightly more powerful version of a
>PLC, in the form of a National Instruments CompactRIO controller,
>running an embedded HMI on touchscreen hardware very similar to Cliff's
>implementation. I want as much as possible for the only manual controls
>and indicators to be those required by the rules as manual overrides,
>and of course the isolation valves at the through hulls. Everything
>else should run automatically or "fly-by-wire" during normal operation.
>Fortuitously, one of my projects at work in 2014 was the development of
>a smooth, high accuracy pressure ramp and control system for automatic
>pressurization and depressurization to 60,000 psi, both hardware and
>software development, so I know how to do this.Sean
>
>
>On March 2, 2016 11:56:31 PM MST, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>Wow some good products Steve,I had a look at your Ebay product
>inventory http://www.ebay.com/sch/tfmengineeringaust/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=I
>can see you will be a great source of knowledge for tracking down those
>tricky bits & pieces.    If Sean puts an LED between the pressure
>sensor & the solenoid valve or between the solenoid valve & it's power
>source, he will be able to see which set of o-rings is not sealing. And
>if he was Cliff he wouldbe feeding the information to his PLC &
>displaying it on his HMI.Cheers Alan
>
>From: Stephen Fordyce via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> 
> Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 7:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hatch interlock
>   
>Hi Sean,
>I really like the idea of vacuum monitoring for hatch leaking - nice
>one. Also Alan a good idea for a single central transmitter monitoring
>the whole thing.A couple of thoughts from me:
>- as well as the vacuum breaker valves on the actual hatches, you'd
>need individual manual isolation valves in the 1atm chamber so you
>determine which was leaking, and in case one leaks.
>- You could protect the transducer from over pressure with a relief
>valve in the 1atm chamber (installed on the 1atm side of isolation
>valves)
>- I'm not sure how likely it really is, but if you got salt water into
>the vacuum space the water would quickly evaporate, leading the salt
>residue to accumulate over time
>- oil lubricated vacuum pumps, or at least the ones I've used, at only
>moderate vacuum can create smoke/oil vapour which would be
>uncomfortable in a sub. Using a diaphragm pump or similar you'd
>probably achieve a much poorer vacuum but no atmospheric contaminants
>- a vacuum switch would probably be cheaper and more likely to survive
>the over pressure, at the cost of less detailed info, ie. This one is
>good to 200m 
>http://www.suco-tech.com/product.php?p=44&c=12
>- actually on reflection, I sell digital gauges for SCUBA gas mixing
>(shameless plug:
>http://m.ebay.com/itm/Electronic-Digital-Pressure-Gauge-for-SCUBA-Blending-Nitrox-Trimix-Oxygen-/262307605334?nav=SEARCH
>) and they are -1 to 400bar(g) in 0.1 bar increments, which would be ok
>for both the vacuum and over pressure, so it can't be too hard, and
>requires an ADC resolution of only 12 bits - if 10 levels of vacuum
>measurement would be ok?
>- I have some very reasonably priced transducer samples coming from the
>same supplier - if they work out ok I could send you one or at least
>the specs.
>- For a quick and easy way of turning high res analogue signals into
>useful digital data I can highly recommend this Arduino shield:
>http://rascalmicro.com/docs-precision-voltage-shield/
>Brandon has made a couple of 18-bit versions for me, which are good
>enough for 0.1% readings from oxygen cells and the like. I've been
>meaning to order some more.Well that turned into a bit of a ramble,
>hopefully some is useful.Cheers,
>SteveOn 3 Mar 2016 3:52 pm, "Sean T. Stevenson via
>Personal_Submersibles" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>
>That's a smart idea. I would also tie that valve actuation mechanically
>into the actuation mechanism for the hatch dogs, so it remains
>intuitive and doesn't require a second action.Sean
>
>
>On March 2, 2016 9:05:54 PM MST, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>Yes, didn't think of the pressure you get when you open the door.You
>would need to have a valve to release the vacuum before being ableto
>open the door, perhaps this valve could be a 3 way valve, letting air
>in between the o-rings& closing the flow to the transducer
>simultaneously. This would stop a low pressure transducer being
>destroyed & stop the vacuu! m pumpcutting in as it would maintain a
>vacuum in the line.Cheers Alan
>From: Brian Cox via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> 
> Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 4:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hatch interlock
>   
>Sean,  If you are only vacuuming that 1" or so circle in-between the O
>rings will the vacuum be enough to hold it?   Seems like you'd have
>around 280# pounds with a 10 Hg vacuum.   or you could  have close to a
>total vacuum?   25 Hg  ?  then you could get upwards to 700# +  ,  If
>the O rings squeezed all the way down you might get metal to metal,
>then would y! ou stillreap the benefit of that area acting as a
>force?   Seems like there would be very little volume of vacuum.  Brian
>
>--- personal_submersibles at psubs.org wrote:
>
>From: "Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles"
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hatch interlock
>Date: W! ed, 02Mar 2016 14:53:19 -0700
>
>I will have one transducer per hatch, so that I can track the interlock
>status and seal integrity per hatch. Each transducer is therefore
>exposed to whatever pressure exists at the flange between orings, which
>in the case of the lockout hatches must necessarily include the
>pressure at full lockout depth, because those flanges are exposed to
>full pressur! e whenthe lockout is operated.  This means that in order
>for this conceptual design to work, I must accept a larger range,
>lesser resolution measurement for those hatches, but it occurs to me
>now that in every case, I would need to accommodate the maximum
>anticipated pressure on either side of each hatch, if I expect to be
>able to track progressive seal leakage without damaging a transducer.
>Ergo, only the 1 atm spaces could make use of 0 - 15 psia transducers.
>The rest would have to be 0 - 250 psia or whatever, and I may require
>higher resolution signal conditioning (24 bit?) to eff! ectivelymeasure
>the range below 1 ata.Sean
>
>
>On March 2, 2016 1:19:54 PM MST, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>Sean,why not leave the transducer in the 1 atm compartment & just
>attach itto the pipe from the compressor that would run through the
>wall to the variouscompartments & sealing flanges. There are of course
>other complications withreleasing the vacuum pressure on the individual
>hatches.Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20160303/45b301fa/attachment-0001.html>