[PSUBS-MAILIST] Speed controllers

Sat Apr 23 19:38:31 EDT 2016

Some years ago, I had an earlier career with the Canadian Coast Guard, one aspect of which was operating fast response rescue boats.  Zodiac Hurricane 733 with twin 150 HP outboards. We lived by one important rule when operating: one hand on the wheel, one hand on the throttle(s) at all times if not in neutral. Our instructor would actually bash our knuckles with whatever was handy if we slipped up in order to ingrain that habit. Now, granted you can get into more trouble at 50 knots than you can at less than 5, but the idea has always stuck with me.

I'm not completely against "cruise control" if properly implemented with safety features (e.g. deadman switch). Certainly I can see this being useful for descent / ascent. I have a tougher time seeing the advantages for navigation of a slow speed submersible.

Sean

On April 23, 2016 4:49:14 PM MDT, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>Hi Sean,I wasn't advocating a fixed position throttle, however electric
>start motor boat throttles don't have a return to neutral function. I
>had thought that that was how your set point system was
>operating.Cheers Alan
>
>
>
>From: Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> 
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 1:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Speed controllers
>   
>Part safety, part allowing for future upgrades. In my mind, if you let
>go of the controls, the vessel should stop, period. If you have an
>alarm, leak, fire or something else that demands your immediate
>attention, you don't want to waste precious time having to null the
>thruster output before dealing with the other problem. Having the
>stick(s) spring return to zero output when you let go is just prudent,
>so you (hopefully) don't crash into anything when you have to let go in
>an emergency, or when you drop your pencil on the floor and throw your
>back out when you bend over to retrieve it.  I would employ self
>nulling controls regardless of whether I was using direct or indirect
>control.With the indirect scheme I proposed, there is an additional
>advantage to be gained in the presence of sensing mechanisms for vessel
>motion (surge, sway, heave, yaw, roll and pitch) such as the ubiquitous
>pressure transducer for depth, gyro/fluxgate compass for heading, or
>e.g. Doppler velocity log for over bottom motion. In these cases, a
>control loop provides the ability to null vessel motion, as opposed to
>simply nulling thruster output, so that if you let go of the controls,
>the system can automatically apply reverse thrust to cancel headway or
>compensate for slight currents etc. to keep the vessel where it was
>when you let go.This is particularly useful in the case of vertical
>motion. I intend to implement such a depth controller so that I drive
>up / down with the stick, with full range on the stick corresponding to
>100% thruster output, but when I let go, the current depth becomes the
>setpoint and the controller takes over, commanding the vertical
>thrusters as appropriate to maintain that depth. Furthermore, in the
>event that maintaining that depth then requires a sustained thruster
>output in either direction, the variable ballast system will
>automatically adjust in order to bring that necessary thruster output
>down to zero and thus conserve power.Sean
>
>On April 22, 2016 11:13:19 PM MDT, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
>Not quite following that Sean,why not have a joystick without return to
>center function &leave it on that setting? I can see the sense in
>running the joystick throughthe PLC with an over-ride on the vertical
>thrusters when on the depth limit,I have seen commercial psubs with
>this feature.Alan
>
>
>From: Sean T. St! evensonvia Personal_Submersibles
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
>To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion
><personal_submersibles at psubs.org> 
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 4:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Speed controllers
>   
>Late to this thread, but I'll throw in my $0.02:I had envisioned a
>control scheme whereby the joystick inputs are decoupled from direct
>thruster / ballast control output. Instead, the PAC runs the thruster
>outputs on the basis of PID control loops, where the setpoints are
>adjusted by the pilot controls. Thus, the ramp rate of the target
>setpoint is dependent on how far e.g. the joystick is pushed or
>rotated, but on letting go, the stick springs back to center, and at
>that point the setpoint is overwritten with the current depth, heading
>or what have you, and the system automatically maintains that setting
>until you touch the controls again.  Manually commanded fully
>automatic.Sean
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>   
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20160423/d34d3f26/attachment.html>