[PSUBS-MAILIST] Kort Nozzle
Jon Wallace
jon.wallace at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 28 13:32:24 EDT 2013
Sounds good...we'll put them under our design section for general download. Will your software produce some jpg or png renderings that will show the finished product as well?
Jon
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 10/28/13, Joe Perkel <josephperkel at yahoo.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Kort Nozzle
To: "Personal Submersibles General Discussion" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Date: Monday, October 28, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jon,
The geometry is not in question if one uses the 3d
printer (or some other machine process) to form the
nozzle, it will be a perfect foil for that $760. I still
need those dimensions to finalize a kort design for anyone
who wants one. When thats done, I'll forward you the CAD
files needed so members can download from the PSUB site to
submit to a vendor of choice.
The kort nozzle itself is simple to do CAD wise,
its a revolve command of the foil section around the axis.
Im working on the supports today.
As for other projects for me, Ill look and see
where, what, and when I can contribute depending on what
ideas are thrown about and viable. All of this helps me
when it comes time to do my own build.
Joe
From: Jon Wallace
<jonw at psubs.org>
To: Personal
Submersibles General Discussion
<personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Monday,
October 28, 2013 11:16 AM
Subject:
[PSUBS-MAILIST] Kort Nozzle
Hi Joe,
There
are a number of enhancements that have been discussed by
members building K-350's. We'd have
to collect those and see what you were comfortable with
committing to. Scott Waters had a list of
enhancements/changes that he recommended as part of his
presentation in Islamorada. He can probably
communicate those or I can look them up from his
slides. James Frankland is another person whom had
suggestions for vessel improvements. I'll see
if I can get a list together and then you can decide if you
want to invest time in them.
In regards to the kort nozzle, I believe the
design geometry required to produce the thrust enhancement
that has been discussed in this thread will not survive a
hand lapped FRP approach. Like an airfoil, any
deviation from the design will
reduce efficiency. Enough deviation and
you've spent a lot of time and money on nothing
more than a glorified prop guard. It would make sense
to include as part of the kort project some means of testing
the efficiency of the actual product so we could determine
the effectiveness of various production methods.
Jon
On
10/27/2013 9:33 PM, Joe Perkel wrote:
Jon,
The short answer
is I dont know. But look at that Dutchman and his simplistic
ingenuity. Thats what Im hoping for out of this group as far
as materials and processes. Im ready to draw up whatever the
result. Consider that there are intrepid builders of all
sorts of things worldwide. Hovercrafters build large scale
ducts for thier craft as a example. I'll take a
look there tomorrow.
How about half a kort??? A plug of some kind
(construction grade foam perhaps?) to build
up a FRP shell over then mate two halves Revelle model
style??? Can this shape be hot wired?? What to use as a
guide? I have ideas and questions, but I need the shop
wizards of the world to come up with the process.
As for The other things, Im ready and willing. I like
the thruster because with my family and work time
constraints, its not too much to chew on. I can commit to
small projects for now, bigger later as time goes on.
What would you like to see done apart from the
thrusters?
Joe
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
More information about the Personal_Submersibles
mailing list