[PSUBS-MAILIST] Best Steel to use for Sub Hull

Tue Oct 22 20:13:05 EDT 2013

Vance,  I am sure I saw recently from Phil that he was using HY 80 but I
don't know what on.  I did a calc on mine and I got a lot deeper using the
HY 80 specs over the Grade 70.

Hugh

From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org]
On Behalf Of vbra676539 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2013 11:55 a.m.
To: personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Best Steel to use for Sub Hull

One other thing comes to mind on this. Phil uses A516Gr70 in the DW2000s. It
occurs to me that if there was a demonstrable benefit to A537, he would have
used taken advantage of it. And he didn't, apparently. Interesting. Don't
know why, though. Maybe it has something to do with welding stainless
inserts in and the heat treatment thereof. Just a guess.

Vance

-----Original Message-----
From: JimToddPsub <JimToddPsub at aol.com>
To: personal_submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Tue, Oct 22, 2013 6:42 pm
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Best Steel to use for Sub Hull

Vance,

>From Leeco Steel's website:

A537 plate steel is heat-treated. As a result, it displays greater yield and
tensile strength than the more standard A516 grades. A537 steel plate is
ideal for both in boilers and pressure vessels, and is used in the oil, gas
and petrochemical industry.

Nice to see it provides at least a brief comparison to A516.  I'm sure there
are more variables to consider including cost.

Jim

In a message dated 10/22/2013 5:23:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
vbra676539 at aol.com writes:

Jim,

A537 was used extensively, as well, especially in the early boats that Perry
built. Maybe you can figure it out. It seems that I recall being told that
it was somewhat harder to weld but had better cold-water-under-pressure
properties. Maybe Dr. Nuytten would weigh in on this, assuming he isn't up
to his ass in DW3000 alligators this week (which I suspect he is).

Vance

-----Original Message-----
From: JimToddPsub <JimToddPsub at aol.com>
To: personal_submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Sent: Tue, Oct 22, 2013 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Best Steel to use for Sub Hull

Greg,

I should have clarified that.  It was a cut-and-paste from a web site.  I'm
more of a librarian in that I save info in an organized fashion when I come
across it so I'll have it available later when the need arises.  That was
the case in this instance.

Jim

In a message dated 10/22/2013 1:25:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jgcottrell2002 at yahoo.com writes:

Thanks for the info, Jim. It's good to know there is some one in the group
that is also in the steel industry.

Greg

From: "JimToddPsub at aol.com" <JimToddPsub at aol.com>
To: personal_submersibles at psubs.org 
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Best Steel to use for Sub Hull

Maybe more detail than you really want to know, but here goes:

ASTM A 516 or ASME SA 516 grade is one of the most popular steel grades in
market . 

It is primarily intended for use in welded pressure vessels where notch
toughness is important. It comes in four grades 55, 60, 65 & 70. At Oakley
Steel we mainly sell 516 gr 60 and 516 gr 70. These grades cover a range of
tensile strengths from 55 - 90 MPa and this versatility explains much of the
specifications popularity. 

For plates thinner than 40mm we normally supply them as rolled. Plates
supplied above 40mm thick are normalised. 

For A 516 grade 70, which is one of our most popular steels, the ASME
standard composition is as follows (dependent on grade): 

Carbon 0.27 - 0.31% 
Manganese 0.79 - 1.3% 
Phosphorous 0.035% max 
Sulphur 0.035% max 
Silicon 0.13 - 0.45% 

In a message dated 10/22/2013 11:53:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
jonw at psubs.org writes:

Generally, A516gr70 suffices for personal or recreational submarines.

Jon

On 10/22/2013 12:45 PM, Christopher Cave wrote:

Hello, 

What is the best steel to use for a submarine hull. Someone mentioned marine
steel such as 316,316L or 317. Any suggestions or a website I can review.

Thanks,

Chris 

Christopher Cave 

christophercave at yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 8951 (20131022) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20131023/f0ca869f/attachment-0001.html>