[PSUBS-MAILIST] buoyancy
hank pronk
hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca
Thu Nov 7 18:17:39 EST 2013
Rick,
I agree the wood will be fine, it will take on water but not enough in one hr to hurt your test. I just went to my pocket ref to look up wood density. Pine is around 25lb per cu ft. I assume that's very dry wood.
Hank
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 4:09:14 PM, Land N Sea <landnsea1 at hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
Thanks guy’s,
Yeh, I expected the wood to compress a bit but only a small amount which I
don’t think is critical in this particular application and I have a bunch of it
laying around the shop. If Hank’s right then I think I will try that as they are
easy to fine tune with a saw, I just didn’t want to have to strap a bundle of
them on.
As far as the webbing between the pods and hull go, I hadn’t thought about
the dry weight loading factor which is a good point. I had planned on welding a
piece of ss round stock between the two ends opposite the drop weight ss round
stock which would prevent them from wanting to flex in either direction but
there would still be a pretty good point load where the pipes meet the hull when
the boats out of the water. I just hate having to put all that heat into the two
pressure hulls if I didn’t have to plus I would eliminate a water trap which is
all ways a good thing. Thanks guy’s
Rick
From: Vance Bradley
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 12:34 PM
To: Personal Submersibles General
Discussion
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] buoyancy
That would be my guess, too.
Vance
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 7, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Joe Perkel <josephperkel at yahoo.com>
wrote:
Maybe Vance can weigh in on this but, I suspect that those webs serve to evenly distribute shock loads for deck handling.
>
>Joe
>
>Sent from my overpriced
>iPhone
>
>On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Jon Wallace <jonw at psubs.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I can't comment on the structural pros/cons
but can tell you that the 600 plate is still in fine condition after 30+
years. It bothers me as well since even after a good rainfall water
collects there, but if properly painted it shouldn't be a big problem.
Maybe give it some extra coats in that area.
>>
>>Jon
>>
>>
>>On
11/7/2013 2:18 PM, Land N Sea wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>I also mentioned the other week about my desire to omit the plate that is welded to the pressure hull and battery pod of a K-350 and was wondering if any one could comment on that.
>>>
>>>Rick
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>
>_______________________________________________
>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>
_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing
list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20131107/a54a01b0/attachment.html>
More information about the Personal_Submersibles
mailing list